Pemanfaatan Drone sebagai Bagian dari Kontra Terorisme: Tinjauan pada Regulasi dan Prosedur Tetap Pengamanan

Muhammad Zaenuddin Firmansyah; Puspitasari Puspitasari

doi:10.35967/njip.v20i1.148

Authors

Muhammad Zaenuddin Firmansyah Universitas Indonesia
Puspitasari Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v20i1.148

Keywords:

Drone, Counter Terorism, Fixed Safeguard Procedures, Regulation, UAV

Abstract

This paper aims to review and evaluate the use of drones in terms of regulations and fixed procedures for safeguarding VVIP and Indonesia's National Vital Objects against drone attacks based on the pathetic incident that befell the President of Venezuela and the National Vital Object of Saudi Arabia. This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis methods. Data collection techniques are carried out by conducting interviews with related officers, equipped with document studies regarding regulations and carried out so that it is easier to understand the importance of the role of security against VVIP and National Vital Objects combined with potential terrorists using unmanned aircraft (UAV) referring to theories cumulative extremism, rational choice and routine activity. As there are regulations on the use of the latest drones, the Paspampres conducts anti-drone security statically and mobile and the Police are making efforts to safeguard National Vital Objects that keep up with the times. Although drone terrorist attacks have not actually occurred in Indonesia, researchers recommend making regulations in the form of data on drone sellers and buyers by the Ministry of Transportation assisted by the Police, building laboratories and strengthening anti-drone technology in border areas and as a sky monitoring system, forming a coalition of institutional cooperation or related institutions to the anti-drone task force, special forces training, and forming anti drone units such as D'Artagnan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afxentiou, A. (2018). A history of drones: Moral(e) bombing and state terrorism. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 11(2), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2018.1456719

Ahmad, M. (2014). The legality of unmanned aerial vehicles outside the combat zone: A case study of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan. Defense & Security Analysis, 30(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2014.921448

Albintani, M. (2017). Pancasila dan Identitas Ke-Indonesia-an: Sebuah Catatan Krisis. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 16(28), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.35967/jipn.v16i28.5825

Anderton, C. H., & Carter, J. R. (2005). On Rational Choice Theory and The Study of Terrorism. Defence and Peace Economics, 16(4), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/1024269052000344864

Ayyubi, S. (2020, October 5). Densus 88 Tangkap Kelompok Teroris di Bekasi, Satu Drone Diamankan | Kabar24. Bisnis.Com. https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20201005/16/1300757/densus-88-tangkap-kelompok-teroris-di-bekasi-satu-drone-diamankan

BBC. (2018). Venezuela President Maduro survives ‘drone assassination attempt’. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-45073385

Blom, J. D. (2010). Unmanned aerial systems: A historical perspective. Combat Studies Institute Press.

Busher, J., & Macklin, G. (2015a). Interpreting “Cumulative Extremism”: Six proposals for enhancing conceptual clarity. Terrorism and Political Violence, 27(5), 884–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2013.870556

Busher, J., & Macklin, G. (2015b). Interpreting “Cumulative Extremism”: Six Proposals for Enhancing Conceptual Clarity. Terrorism and Political Violence, 27(5), 884–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2013.870556

Chapman, A. (2016, November 8). Drone Types: Multi-Rotor vs Fixed-Wing vs Single Rotor vs Hybrid VTOL. AUAV. https://www.auav.com.au/articles/drone-types/

CNN Indonesia. (2019). Serangan Drone Bakar Dua Fasilitas Saudi Aramco. Internasional. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20190914153530-120-430494/serangan-drone-bakar-dua-fasilitas-saudi-aramco

Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity

Approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589

DW. (2019). Indonesia Kembangkan Drone Black Eagle untuk Cegah Terorisme Hingga Karhutla. DW.COM. https://www.dw.com/id/indonesia-kembangkan-drone-black-eagle-untuk-cegah-terorisme-hingga-karhutla/a-51844336

Dwi, A. (2017, August 6). 11 Jenis Drone yang Mungkin Belum Anda Ketahui. Folder Tekno. https://www.foldertekno.com/jenis-drone/

Eatwell, R. (2006). Community Cohesion and Cumulative Extremism in Contemporary Britain. The Political Quarterly, 77(2), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00763.x

Firmansyah, H. (2011). Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 23(2), 237–429.

Freilich, J. D., & LaFree, G. (2015). Criminology Theory and Terrorism: Introduction to the Special Issue. Terrorism and Political Violence, 27(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2014.959405

Hasanuddin. (2011). Dinamika dan Pengerucutan Teori Gerakan Sosial. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(15), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.35967/jipn.v10i1.1601

Hidayati, Nu. (2021). Drone Bersenjata, Modus Operandi Baru Teroris Asia Tenggara? Matamapolitik, Berita Dunia Internasional Dan Berita Politik Indonesia Terbaru Hari Ini. https://www.matamatapolitik.com/akankah-drone-jadi-modus-operandi-baru-teroris-di-asia-tenggara-analisis/

Husodo, A. Y., Jati, G., Octavian, A., & Jatmiko, W. (2020). Switching target communication strategy for optimizing multiple pursuer drones performance in immobilizing Kamikaze multiple evader drones. ICT Express, 6(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2020.03.007

Jusuf, W. (2017). Ancaman Drone Teroris. tirto.id. https://tirto.id/ancaman-drone-teroris-csuH

Koblentz, G. D. (2020). Emerging Technologies and the Future of CBRN Terrorism. The Washington Quarterly, 43(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2020.1770969

Libel, T., & Boulter, E. (2015). Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the Israel Defense Forces: A Precursor to a Military Robotic Revolution? The RUSI Journal, 160(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2015.1036550

Ly, B., & Ly, R. (2020). Cybersecurity in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Journal of Cyber Security Technology, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23742917.2020.1846307

Mako_Kohanudnas, P. (2018). Panglima TNI Tinjau Peralatan Antidrone Kohanudnas. https://tni-au.mil.id/panglima-tni-tinjau-peralatan-antidrone-kohanudnas/

Marsela, M. (2016). Teroris Mulai Gunakan Drone untuk Lancarkan Aksi. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20160111145642-185-103488/teroris-mulai-gunakan-drone-untuk-lancarkan-aksi

Matamapolitik. (2021, February 8). Mengulik 10 Drone Tempur Terbaik di Dunia 2020. Berita Dunia Internasional Dan Berita Politik Indonesia Terbaru Hari Ini. https://www.matamatapolitik.com/10-drone-tempur-terbaik-di-dunia-pada-2020-listicle/

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta. UI Press.

Miró, F. (2014). Routine Activity Theory. In The Encyclopedia of Theoretical Criminology (pp. 1–7). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517390.wbetc198

Purnomo, L. (2020, October 6). Pengertian dan Sejarah Perkembangan Drone. https://liupurnomo.com/pengertian-dan-sejarah-perkembangan-drone/

Rahman, K. (2017). Pelayanan Pemerintahan yang Bertanggung Jawab. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 16(28), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.35967/jipn.v16i28.5823

Ridwan, M., Anwar, K., & Marta, A. (2011). Inventarisasi Kebijakan Publik (Kajian di Desa Buluh Cina Kecamatan Siak Hulu Kabupaten Kampar). Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(16), 93–101.

Rinehart, C. S. (2017). Sharing security in an era of international cooperation: Unmanned aerial vehicles and the United States’ Air Force. Defense & Security Analysis, 33(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2016.1269390

Wicaksono, B. (2013). Penguatan Wilayah Perbatasan: Studi Kasus Pulau Sebatik Kabupaten Nunukan Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 12(20), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.35967/jipn.v12i2.2905