Studi Kelembagaan dalam Keberlanjutan Becak Tradisional di Kota Yogyakarta

Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v22i1.447

Kata Kunci:

Transportasi Berkelanjutan, Becak Tradisional, Social Network Analysis

Abstrak

Keberlanjutan keberadaan becak tradisional di Kota Yogyakarta sebagai salah satu daya tarik wisatawan dalam mendukung sektor pariwisata mampu bertahan selama beberapa dekade hingga saat ini. Hal ini menimbulkan dugaan bahwa keberlanjutan keberadaan becak tradisional di Kota Yogyakarta sebagai bagian dari sektor pariwisata disebabkan oleh faktor terpenuhinya kesiapan aspek-aspek tertentu yang tergolong dalam konsep transportasi yang mengalami keberlanjutan, seperti aspek sosial dan kelembagaan. Oleh karena itu, tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi pola kelembagaan dan aktor yang paling berperan dalam keberlanjutan becak tradisional di Kota Yogyakarta. Metodologi utama penelitian ini adalah metode analisis isi (content analysis) dan Social Network Analysis (SNA) menggunakan software UCINET dan NetDraw. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hubungan di antara semua aktor yang terlibat dalam jaringan terkait keberlanjutan moda becak tradisional tidak berlangsung dengan baik. Selain itu, Bappeda Kota Yogyakarta adalah aktor yang memiliki peran paling signifikan dalam jaringan terkait keberlanjutan becak tradisional.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Benfield, F. K., & Replogle, M. (2002). The Roads More Traveled: Sustainable Transportation in America-Or Not. Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis, 32, 10633.

Berglund, T., Gericke, N., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2014). The Implementation of Education for Sustainable Development in Sweden: Investigating the Sustainability Consciousness Among Upper Secondary Students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(3), 318-339.

Bisri, M. B. (2012). Exploring Intergovernmental and Inter-organizational Cooperation in Disaster Management (The Case of West Java Earthquake 2009). Bandung: Bandung Institute of Technology.

Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of Measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.

Cervero, R. (1991). Paratransit in Southeast Asia: A Market Response to Poor Roads?. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 3(1), 3-27.

Cervero, R. (2000). Informal Transport in the Developing World. UN-HABITAT.

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Deakin, E. (2002). Sustainable Transportation US Dilemmas and European Experiences. Transportation Research Record, 1792(1), 1-11.

Eriyanto. (2014). Analisis Jaringan Komunikasi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Forward, S., Hylén, B., Barta, D., Czerma?ski, E., Åkerman, J., Vesela, J., ... & Weiss, L. (2014). Challenges and Barriers for a Sustainable Transport System-State of the Art Report.

Ghosh, N. (2008). The Road from Economic Growth to Sustainable Development: How was it Traversed?. Available at SSRN 1082686.

Haghshenas, H., & Vaziri, M. (2012). Urban Sustainable Transportation Indicators for Global Comparison. Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 115-121.

Jennings, G., & Behrens, R. (2017). The Case for Investing in Paratransit: Strategies for Regulation and Reform.

Joewono, T. B., & Kubota, H. (2007). User Perceptions of Private Paratransit Operation in Indonesia. Journal of Public Transportation, 10(4), 99-118.

Kapucu, N. (2014). Complexity, Governance and Networks: Perspectives from Public Administration. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 1(1), 29-38.

Khotami. (2020). Institution Building dalam Mengatasi Persoalan Pertambangan Emas Tanpa Izin di Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi Provinsi Riau. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 19(1), 17-37.

Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance Networks in the Public Sector. Oxford: Routledge.

Kuppens, M. (2016). Network Governance: A Comparison of Four Dutch Regions in Their Approach Towards the Housing of EU Migrant Workers. Nijmegen: Department of Public Administration-Faculty of Management Sciences-Radboud University Nijmegen.

Lecy, J. D., Mergel, I. A., & Schmitz, H. P. (2014). Networks in Public Administration: Current Scholarship in Review. Public Management Review, 16(5), 643-665.

Mandala, Zeji. (2013). Pola Spasial Pergerakan Paratransit di Kawasan Stasiun Lempuyangan Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Tugas Akhir Jurusan Teknik Arsitektur dan Perencanaan Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Phillips, B. (2011). Sustainable Transport-The Pedicab Experience. SATC 2011.

Prell, C. (2012). Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology. Sage.

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.

Rhodes, R. A. (2017). Network Governance and the Differentiated Polity: Selected Essays (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.

Purnama, A. I. (2011). Kebijakan Transportasi Berkelanjutan: Suatu Penerapan Metodologi yang Komprehensif. Jakarta: Badan Koordinasi Penataan Ruang Nasional.

Scott, J. (1992). Corporate Interlocks and Social Network Analysis. Social Sciences Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.

Shimazaki, T., & Rahman, M. (1996). Physical Characteristics of Paratransit in Developing Countries of Asia. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 30(2), 5-24.

Sinakou, E., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Goossens, M., & Van Petegem, P. (2018). Academics in the field of Education for Sustainable Development: Their Conceptions of Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 321-332.

Sulastri, S., Lingganingrum, L., Risky Ramadan, A., Hadi Angesti, T., Setiabudi, W., & Al-Hamdi, R. (2022). Model of Collaboration between Stakeholders in Creating Environmentally Friendly Elections: A Case Study in the 2020 Yogyakarta

Simultaneous Regional Elections. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 21(2), 218-230.

Vuchic, V. R. (2007). Urban Transit System and Technology. Canada: John Wiley & Sons.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications.

Zhou, J. (2012). Sustainable Transportation in the US: A Review of Proposals, Policies, and Programs Since 2000. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 1(2), 150-165.

Zitri, I., Lestanata, Y., Darmansyah, D., Amil, A., & Umami, R. (2022). The Zero Waste System Waste Management Policy Innovation in West Nusa Tenggara the Pentahelix Model. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 21(1), 107-119.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2023-06-30

Cara Mengutip

Iscahyono, A. F., & Kusumantoro, I. P. (2023). Studi Kelembagaan dalam Keberlanjutan Becak Tradisional di Kota Yogyakarta. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 22(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v22i1.447

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Artikel Serupa

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

Anda juga bisa Mulai pencarian similarity tingkat lanjut untuk artikel ini.