Musyawarah Minim Negosiasi: Potret Deficient Village Governance pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19

Wawan Sobari

doi:10.35967/njip.v22i1.411

Authors

Wawan Sobari Universitas Brawijaya https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-668X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v22i1.411

Keywords:

Village Discution, COVID-19, Village Governance, Deliberation

Abstract

This study explored the practice of village governance (TKPD), particularly the practice of making village development policies during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2022) in Malang Regency, East Java. The policy-making was carried out in the village deliberation forum (musdes). This research specifically sought to discover the practice of musdes during the COVID-19 pandemic. It applied a qualitative methodology and an observational analysis method, with the interview as the main data-gathering technique. This study reveals changes in the practice and meaning of musdes in setting village development policies. The pandemic situation has forced the government to drive village development policy options that are not fully in accordance with the needs and demands of villagers. Musdes has changed its meaning. It is no longer a space for consultation and negotiation. Musdes become a non-deliberative forum that functions for clarification and approval of village development policies that have been directed by government and regency regulations. This finding reinforces previous studies that the village law and implementing regulations experience critical differences from musdes as a deliberation space because it reduces representation of the community and actors who can be involved in decision-making. The exploration of the practice and meaning of musdes during the COVID-19 pandemic adds to the village governance literature, which was different from the situation prior to the pandemic. At that time, the village government still had enough space to accommodate the villagers' demands. This study echoes the state-centered approach to explaining village governance by discovering the government as an obstacle to village governance. This study also contributes to extending village governance literature by proposing the worth of considering an antecedent factor that encourages the government and regency to issue regulations that do not support village governance. The context of the pandemic can explain factors that occurred prior to the issuance of government regulation, which then hindered village governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alpermann, B. J. Ö. R. N. (2012). Village governance reforms in China: Paradigm shift or muddling through? In Towards a New Development Paradigm in Twenty-First Century China (pp. 163–180). Routledge.

Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2022). Introduction to the Handbook on Theories of Governance. In Handbook on Theories of Governance (pp. 1–16). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village governance, community life, and the 2014 village law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183.

Boin, A., Lodge, M., & Luesink, M. (2020). Learning from the COVID-19 crisis: an initial analysis of national responses. Policy Design and Practice, 3(3), 189–204.

Care Peduli Foundation. (2020). Panduan Penggunaan Dana Desa untuk Respon COVID-19. Care Peduli Foundation.

Chhotray, V., & Stoker, G. (2009). Governance: From theory to practice. In Governance theory and practice (pp. 214–247). Springer.

Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities. (2020). How COVID-19 is changing the world: a statistical perspective. . Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities.

Hidayat, F. (2017). Pancasila: perspektif pendiri RI dan problematikanya. STIBA Pertiwi, Bekasi, Tanpa Tahun.

Hynes, W., Linkov, I., & Trump, B. (2020). A systemic resilience approach to dealing with Covid-19 and future shocks. OECD New Approaches to Economic Challenges (NAEC). OECD.

Indriani, M., Nadirsyah, Fuadi, R., & Evayani. (2020). Can Siskeudes support village governance in Aceh Province of Indonesia? Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1743617.

Jayadi, N. (2019). Indigenous village governance: lessons from Indonesia. ??????? ???????????????? ? ?????????????? ??????????, 6, 94–104.

Kabupaten Malang. (2020). Peraturan Bupati Malang Nomor 14 Tahun 2020 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Bupati Malang Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 Tentang Tata Cara Pembagian Dan Penetapan Rincian Dana Desa Pada Setiap Desa Serta Pedoman Teknis Penggunaan Dana Desa Tahun Anggaran 2020.

Kabupaten Malang. (2021). Peraturan Bupati Malang Nomor 3 Tahun 2021 Tentang Tata Cara Penetapan dan Rincian Dana Desa Pada Setiap Desa Serta Petunjuk Teknis Penggunaan Dana Desa Tahun Anggaran 2021.

Kushandajani, & Alfirdaus, L. K. (2019). Women’s empowerment in village governance transformation in Indonesia: Between hope and criticism. International Journal of Rural Management, 15(1), 137–157.

Lupton, D., & Willis, K. (2021). The COVID-19 crisis. Social Perspectives. London: Routledge.

Mujani, S., & Irvani, D. (2020). Sikap dan Perilaku Warga terhadap Kebijakan Penanganan Wabah Covid-19. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 11(2), 219–238.

Munir, D. A., Mulyani, S., & Akbar, B. (2020). Effect of good village governance implementation in Indonesia. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(2), 233–243.

Nurlinah, N., & Haryanto, H. (2020). Institutional Mechanisms and Civic Forum in Coastal Village Governance in Indonesia. Public Policy and Administration, 19(3), 76–85.

OECD. (2021). Risks that matter 2020: The long reach of COVID-19.

Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa.

Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa.

Republik Indonesia. (2020a). Keputusan Presiden Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penetapan Kedaruratan Kesehatan Masyarakat Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Republik Indonesia. (2020b). Keputusan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penetapan Bencana Nonalam Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Sebagai Bencana Nasional.

Republik Indonesia. (2020c). Peraturan Menteri Desa, Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi Nomor 06 Tahun 2020 tentang Prioritas Penggunaan Dana Desa Tahun 2020.

Republik Indonesia. (2020d). Surat Edaran Menteri Desa, Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi Nomor 8 Tahun 2020 tentang Desa Tanggap COVID-19.

Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Presiden (PERPRES) tentang Rincian Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara Tahun Anggaran 2022.

Rumkel, L., Sam, B., & Umanailo, M. C. B. (2019). Village head partnership, village consultative body and customary institution in village development. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res, 8(8), 1058–1063.

Said, A. (2020). Uncovering Partnership among Village Stakeholders in Village Governance: An Evidence from East Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 2527–2532.

Salim, A., Bulan, W. R., Untung, B., Laksono, I., & Brock, K. (2017). Indonesia’s Village Law: enabler or constraint for more accountable governance?

Sarantakos, S. (2017). Social research. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Sartika, I., Syafri, W., & Gatiningsih, G. (2019). Good Village Governance: How Governance Concept Implemented at Rural In Developing Country.

Schwab, K., & Malleret, T. (2020). The great reset. World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland, 22.

Sujana, E., Kurniawan Saputra, K. A., & Manurung, D. T. H. (2020). Internal control systems and good village governance to achieve quality village financial reports. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(9).

Susilowati, N., Mahmud, A., Widhiastuti, R., & Rahman-ingtyas, W. (2020). Good Village Governance: Internal Control Model of Village Funds Management. KnE Social Sciences, 137–148.

Syukri, M. (2016). Catatan Kebijakan Smeru Seri UU Desa No. 1/Des/2015. Peran Kecamatan Dalam Pelaksanaan UU Desa.

Syukri, M. (2021). Gender Equality in Indonesian New Developmental State: The Case of the New Participatory Village Governance. Jakarta: Smeru Research Institute.

Tan, Q. (2010). Why village election has not much improved village governance. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 15(2), 153–167.

Tjarsono, I. (2013). Demokrasi Pancasila Dan Bhineka Tunggal Ika Solusi Heterogenitas. Transnasional, 4(2), 876–888.

Vel, J. A. C., & Bedner, A. W. (2015). Decentralisation and village governance in Indonesia: the return to the nagari and the 2014 Village Law. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), 493–507.

Wijoyo, S., Salman, R., & Abrianto, B. O. (2017). Making Model of Village Regulation based on Good Village Governance in Indonesia. 1st International Conference Postgraduate School Universitas Airlangga:" Implementation of Climate Change Agreement to Meet Sustainable Development Goals"(ICPSUAS 2017), 71–77.

Yuhertiana, I., Widajatie, T. D., & Akbar, F. S. (2016). Financial Confusion and Corruption Anxiety: A Good Village Governance Pressure. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX, 1–15.